COVID-19 Notice: The Perecman Firm has returned to in-person operation in accordance with safety regulations set by New York State and CDC health officials. Our attorneys will continue to provide top-notch legal representation and are available to discuss your case in person, over the phone, via email or video.

Result: $3.5 Million Settlement for Union Mechanic Who Was Seriously Injured in a Slip and Fall Accident

The Perecman Firm secured a $3,500,000 settlement for a union mechanic who was injured in a slip and fall accident while replacing a rooftop water tank.

On Sept. 23, 2000, the plaintiff, a union mechanic, sustained injuries in a slip-and-fall accident while replacing a rooftop water tank in New York. The plaintiff and his co-workers were using an elevator-service room's roof as a work platform. The plaintiff was standing on the service-room roof, lowering tools to co-workers on the building's main roof. During the course of this activity, he placed one foot on the service-room roof's parapet wall, which was wet as a result of rain. The plaintiff slipped off the wall and fell 12 feet.

The plaintiff brought a Labor Law 240(1) action against the defendant, which had hired his firm to replace the water tank. He moved for summary judgment on liability.

The defendant opposed the motion, arguing that Labor Law 240(1) was inapplicable because the plaintiff was not engaged in construction activity at the time he was injured--he and his co-workers were gathering tools at the end of the workday.

The judge granted summary judgment. The defense appealed, but the appellate division, Second Department, affirmed.

The plaintiff sustained comminuted, intra-articular fractures of his calcanei, which were repaired via open reduction and internal fixation. The plaintiff’s expert radiologist would have contended that he suffers from post-traumatic arthritic changes in both feet.

The plaintiff has not worked since the incident. His expert orthopedist would have testified that he is no longer capable of performing construction work.

The plaintiff’s expert economist estimated that he sustained $298,427 in lost wages and $170,874 in lost benefits. The expert also estimated that the plaintiff will lose an additional $2,773,410 in wages and $1,769,320 in benefits.

The plaintiff’s wife claimed loss of services.

The defense's expert orthopedist would have contended that the plaintiff has recovered well. Its vocational-rehabilitation expert would have contended that the plaintiff is capable of earning $35,000 to $50,000 a year in a non-construction capacity.

  • Best Lawyers "Lawyer of the Year" 2022
  • Best Lawyers in America©, 2008-2022
  • U.S. News' Best Law Firms in America, 2011-2022
  • TopVerdict™
  • TopVerdict™
  • Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch
  • Super Lawyers® Top 100, 2019-2021
  • Super Lawyers®, 2007-2021
  • New York Law Journal's "Top Verdicts in New York"
  • New York Magazine' s Legal Leaders 2021
  • Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum®
  • The National Trial Lawyers
  • 10 Best Law Firms
  • Avvo 10.0 Rating
  • Lawyers of Distinction
  • National Academy of Personal Injury Attorneys Top 10
  • Top 10 Personal Injury Law Firms

When You Call Us

  • We have a stellar record of success in accident cases.
  • We are premier trial lawyers and smart litigators.
  • We are highly respected in the legal community.
  • We make you our top priority.
  • We have over 40 years of proven legal experience under our belts.

No Fees 

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.