COVID-19 UPDATE: The Perecman Firm is open! Our team is working remotely and offering confidential consultations via phone, e-mail, and video conferencing. Read more from Founding Attorney, David Perecman.
New York Personal Injury Lawyers
Call Today for a Free Consultation 212.577.9325 We Are Available 24/7

Union Carpenter Injured by Falling 670-Pound Plate


The Perecman Firm secured a $3,200,000 million settlement for the family of a union carpenter who was seriously injured by a falling plate and later died from issues tied to the accident after the lawsuit was filed.

The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C. represented a client who sustained injuries to his ankle, a leg, his pelvis and several ribs. After filing the lawsuit, the plaintiff's decedent died because of acute toxicity caused by combined use of alcoholic beverages and morphine, which was prescribed to address an injury related to the accident. Because of this the estate's counsel contended that his death was a product of the accident.

On Feb. 23, 2013, the plaintiff's decedent, a union-affiliated carpenter and foreman, worked at a construction site. Large plates, whose weight approximated 670 pounds, were being hoisted to various levels of a skyscraper. The plaintiff's decedent had loaded the hoist. During the course of the operation, one plate fell out of the hoist. The plate plummeted some nine feet, landed on the ground, bounced and struck plaintiff's decedent.

The plaintiff's decedent sued the construction project's general contractors and the site's owner. The plaintiff's decedent alleged that the defendants violated the New York State Labor Law.

He died after the lawsuit had been filed. The suit was continued by his estate.

The estate's counsel contended that the accident was a result of a failure of the hoist. The plate and the hoist's lifting ring had been attached via a metal rod and nuts, but the hardware could not support the plate's weight. The rod was a soft metal object that was being used in place of the hardened steel eye bolt that was a standard component of the hoist's ring. The steel bolt had been lost. The estate's counsel claimed that the ring's manual specified that the steel bolt was a necessary component of the ring. The estate's expert metallurgist opined that the bolt's absence undermined the ring's integrity, and he contended that the plaintiff's decedent should have been warned that the hoist could have failed.

The estate's counsel also contended that the plaintiff's decedent had not been provided an appropriate wrench and therefore could not fully tighten the nuts that were securing the plate. The estate's expert metallurgist opined that the plaintiff's decedent should have been provided a torque wrench.

The estate's counsel contended that the incident stemmed from an elevation-related hazard, as defined by Labor Law 240(1), and that the plaintiff's decedent was not provided the proper, safe equipment that is a requirement of the statute.

Defense counsel contended that the accident was a result of the plaintiff's decedent having failed to adequately secure the plate. They claimed that he merely hand-tightened the securing nuts, rather than utilizing a wrench. They contended that the plaintiff's decedent was the competent person in charge of the work and therefore should have understood the danger created by an inadequately secured load.

The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. The defendants' insurers agreed to pay a total of $3.2 million.

More Than $500 million In Verdicts & Settlements For Our Clients

The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C.'s team of NYC personal injury attorneys have recovered more than $500 million in verdicts and settlements for their clients. We understand the financial and emotional toll a serious accident can have on your life. That’s why we dedicate ourselves to maximizing your recovery and securing what you deserve.

See Our Results
  • $40,000,000*
    Medical malpractice. Child's brain damage.
    Construction worker fell from a ladder, jury verdict.
    Construction worker/ laborer fell from the scaffold, jury verdict.
See Our Results


  • “Mr. Perecman had my best interests at heart.”

    - Anonymous

  • “Like Family!”

    - Alyssa O

  • “I LOVE The Perecman Firm!”

    - Naida M.

  • “Se experimenta una emoción muy bonita al ganar un caso porque te das cuenta que le has salvado la vida a alguien.”

    - Jose J.

  • “Best choice I made!”

    - Pedro B.

View More
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.