New York Personal Injury Lawyers
Call Today for a Free Consultation 212.577.9325 We Are Available 24/7

Matthew McDonnell v. Sandaro Realty, Inc., et al.

This is a useful case for lawyers because it covers a lot of topics, and it also explains a lot for workers to know. The case restated the law for the “scaffold law” or Labor Law 240(1) that when a worker is injured at a construction site because a part of their elevation safety device (ladder, scaffold, hoist, ropes, etc.) broke, failed, collapsed or moved, they are entitled to what we call summary judgment. That means the worker already wins the “who is legally responsible for their accident” part of their case without a trial, and would only have a trial for a jury to determine how much compensation they get – the money decision. The rest of the case is somewhat technical. The case explains what happens when one of the participants/parties to the lawsuit makes or allows evidence to disappear. Here, it was the broken plank. The court can give them some very stiff penalties that help the other parties to the case, including the worker. The court also spoke about the rules and laws between the contractors. In these cases, the contractor, owners, and sub-contractors try to put the blame on each other since they already lost and probably knew they were going to lose against the plaintiff, the injured worker.

More News & Media Videos

Simmons v. City of New York, et al.:

In the Simmons case, a plumber was injured when a compressor fell a ...

Play Video

Jeffrey White v. 31-01 Steinway, LLC, et al.:

In these kind of cases, it’s not always easy to explain why the worker ...

Play Video

Joseph A. Fedrich v. Granite Building 2, LLC, et al.:

A fire marshal who inspecting the sprinklers can bring a suit under ...

Play Video

Gorque Morocho v. Boulevard Gardens Owners Corp., et al.:

Construction worker wins summary judgment where worker falls from ...

Play Video

Edisson Paguay v, Cup of Tea, LLC, et al.:

We see the court here saying what we’ve explained before – that you ...

Play Video

Ronald Gillett v. City of New York, et al.:

I have handled countless cases over the years where a worker used an ...

Play Video

Bobby Jones, et al. v City of New York, et al.:

This case is a mixed bag. The worker injured himself while climbing up ...

Play Video

Ioannis Giannas v. 100 3rd Avenue Corp., et al.:

This is an interesting case from the Appellate Division, Second ...

Play Video

John Slawsky v. Turner Construction Co., et al.:

Here the Appellate Division, First Department Court applied a ...

Play Video

Thomas Quigley, et al. v. Port Authority of N.Y. & N.J., et al.:

Here, we have the Court discussing the law regarding one of the most ...

Play Video

More Than $400 million In Verdicts & Settlements For Our Clients

The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C.'s team of NYC personal injury attorneys have recovered more than $400 million in verdicts and settlements for their clients. We understand the financial and emotional toll a serious accident can have on your life. That’s why we dedicate ourselves to maximizing your recovery and securing what you deserve.

See Our Results
  • $40,000,000*
    Medical malpractice. Child's brain damage.
    $15,208,168**
    Construction worker fell from a ladder, jury verdict.
    $9,825,000***
    Construction worker/ laborer fell from the scaffold, jury verdict.
See Our Results

Testimonials

  • “I LOVE The Perecman Firm!”

    - Naida M.

  • “Like Family!”

    - Alyssa O

  • “He made a difference for me and my family.”

    - Jose J.

  • “One of the best decisions I had ever made”

    - Joseph L.

  • “Mr. Perecman had my best interests at heart”

    - Anonymous

View More
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.